Romancing the Goth (part 4)
Posted in Rant, Romance on May 18th, 2010 by admin
Greetings my dear Gothlings!
Now, while my “Romancing the Goth” blog posts are usually reserved for romantic tips and tid-bits to give those fortunate enough to be in a relationship ideas to heighten their romance level, I want to shift gears here to discuss, dissect, and delve, into an age old adage:
“It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.”
Now, everyone of us has heard this at one point in our lives…but have you ever sat down and truly thought about what it means? Sure, on the surface it’s an easy way to soothe someone that has just been a victim of a break-up or, even worse, death of a loved one. Basically stating: “Hey! At least you’ve been there/done that, than rather being some loser that still lives in their parents’ basement!” But, the other day, this quote popped into my head as I was sorting out some emotional issues, and I really, really, started to ponder over this adage. Soon, I realized that I was totally on the fence when it came to this statement! Let us dissect it, shall we?
O.K., first off the quote presents two general, yet distinctive, scenarios, and blatantly states that one is way better off than the other. It’s a pretty broad stroke of a paint brush, if you think about it. I mean, every relationship is different in their own merit…I don’t think you can appropriately group everything into two categories of the ‘have lost’ and the ‘never hads.’ There is way more to consider…but for now we’ll play the game and focus on these two scenarios. Two categories of people: Those who have loved someone (at least once), and those who, for some inexplicable reason, has never loved anyone in their entire very lonely lives. And let me make something abundantly clear right here and now…I’m talking about romantic love…not the family/friend/pet type of love…real passionate/”let’s get married” love! O.K.? Got it? Good! Moving on…
In the first instance, said individual is someone who, at a certain point in his or her life, has had the distinct opportunity to have met another individual and thus proceeded to successfully cultivate the relationship up to a point to which one (the individual in question), or both individuals profess their love to one another. Then, tragically, at that instant, or even years down the line, due to a gaz-illion reasons — most tragic of the bunch: death — said individual has lost the particular love in question. Quelle tristesse. So now, the individual is left there heart-broken and in pain…and that’s a good thing, right? Hmm…
In the second instance we are introduced to another (albeit tragic in his or her own right) individual who, for some inexplicable, yet obviously horrible, reason has never, and will never, fully experience true and actual love from another living human being. Again, Quelle tristesse…but this type of individual hardly exists!!! Hell, I’ve known and seen severely handicapped (mental & physical) people find great love with others! It’s a basic human instinct to seek it! No…the ‘never have loved’ crowd must be some really fucked up social misfits for this adage to so easily put them down as the worse of the two evils!
And, ultimately, this is, essentially, a battle between ‘two evils,’ is it not? Which one is worse: having a taste of sweet love yet having it removed after only a few bites, or never being able to sit at the table due to some serious lack of social skills, or maybe being a leper?!? Now…don’t get me wrong…if it seems like I’m coming down a bit harsh on the ‘never hads’ set, let me confess that I once belonged to that group…and possibly still do!
Without getting into too much great detail, my past dating life and relationships with the opposite sex has either been non-existent (mostly throughout high-school and college) or at the very least somewhat bizarre. A Con-woman, a stalker, a “I don’t know what just happen for the past month, but did it really happen, and why did it stop?” situation, and Morning-After Pill incident (not in any particular order) is only a taste of the cursed state my social life finds itself in. I don’t even really know if I even experienced true love anyways…but what I do know is that I’ve experienced lots and lots of loss. However, even as I find myself at the age when most men are going through their first or even second second divorce, I pine for romance with someone special…it’s a strong part of my Gothy angst!
Back to the issue at hand…How is it possible that those who have never loved someone be worse off than those that have lost a loved one??? Technically, those who have never loved, or been loved by anyone, do not know (or have experienced) what love actually feels like. Maybe a facsimile might be achieved by what the mass media dictates what real love “should” feel/be like via song lyrics, soap operas, dramas, and reality t.v. shows…but let’s put that aside…that’s a whole other topic for another posting. If anything, the ‘never hads’ might pine for the thought of love…not for anyone specific…someone who, theoretically, they have yet to meet.
No. I think that I have to argue that it is “worse to have loved and lost than to to have never loved at all!” The pain of heartbreak is intense and very palpable. It cuts through you to the core. It’s almost as if that heavy and fluttering feeling you experience in your head, chest, abdomen, and loins when you are falling in love with someone is suddenly reversed. It feels almost the same, but it’s stronger, darker, and much more hurtful. I’ve had the misfortune of experiencing both within a month’s worth of time…not pleasant. But again…every relationship is different…
Which brings me to a third (unthought of) scenario: the long distance relationship. Why doesn’t the adage cover this set-up? Although highly romantic, the long-distance relationship is in a sort of ‘purgatory’ between the two scenarios of ‘have lost’ and ‘never hads.’ Those who find themselves here are in a committed relationship while having lost said relationship to distance…so technically it’s better than both the ‘have losts’ and the ‘never hads,’ right? Sure, there is hope involved with this situation…however, the long distance relationship is always plagued with problems, namely jealousy, and the inevitable separation of commonality…slowly taking a path toward being a ‘have lost’ when the end-all statement of “I think we should see other people,” is uttered by one of the participants.
Actually, after pondering over this entire subject, I’ve concluded that whomever created this old, and somewhat seemingly wise, saying belonged to the fourth scenario, also missing from said saying, of romance categories: ‘the haves!’ These individuals have it best, don’t they? They found love at least once and still have it…they have no idea what the other ‘never had’ or ‘have lost’ scenarios feel like…but I’m sure they know someone who just went through a gut-wrenching break-up and will smugly advise:
“It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.”
BULLSHIT!!! The saying should read something like:“It is better to love and hold on to it then to be in a long distance relationship which will more than likely result in a lost love, but if you’ve never loved at all…ignorance is bliss!”
No…I’m not bitter…
See you in the Dark!
Sir William Welles

